For years, I have struggled to find consistent real-world connections between education and community. The following is a series of discussion points and questions I have arrived at in considering possible connections. I don’t presume to have reached any definitve answers. I’m still trying to narrow the field of questions at this stage.
After reading, your thoughts on the topic would be greatly appreciated.
—
Communal sharing is a practice we work hard to instill in young minds, and yet we do a terrible job of sharing the wealth when it comes to education. Look in just about any society: Quality education is treated as a high-priced commodity, widely available only to those with vast financial means.
And what exactly is lost when we restrict access to our most treasured academic resources, packaging them like honey hams ripe for the purchase?
The plurality of ideas is compromised. The giants upon whose shoulders we stand are shrunk. The quest for truth is hampered.
A smaller pool of literate, informed individuals reduces competition for the incumbent big fish, but it also stymies discourse among the masses.
Everything in today’s world comes at a price, even knowledge and opportunities. The affluent and linked in know how to manage money and power. They have plenty of practice. Rule number 1: don’t let either out of your family’s grip, ever.
As the old adage goes, “It’s not what you know, it’s who you know.” Ain’t that the truth. Though I think it’s appropriate to add, “but it definitely matters what they think of you!”
But aren’t the aims of education supposed to reflect the needs of the individual and the community? Aren’t the arguments in favor of educational standards clearly tied up with community–E.g. The desire to instill common knowledge and skills–indeed common sense–in young minds through methodical and effective training.
And who determines the boundaries of these so-called communities? Who decides what it means to be left behind by the educational system? What are the minimum standards of educational achievement? Which educational opportunities are reserved for those with a fat checkbook?
How do perceptions of the implied community influence curriculum content and the pedagogy by which it is delivered? Why are educational communities set as regional entities by default? Is it only about funding? Sounds a lot like the tail wagging the dog if you ask me. Educational aims and achievements should not be at the mercy of local governments, except insofar as each must be justified by the other.
I am one of those who is hopeful that new modes of communication will help us to bring a fresh stream of ideas to the stale backwaters of our education systems. We can do so much better than what we now provide. The online educational communities that are beginning to emerge are a breath of fresh air. Real conversations are taking place all day, everyday; across borders, across disciplines, across every kind of boundary imaginable.
I do fear, however, that the existence of our new online communities may give us a false sense of security–like a support group you can always count on for encouraging words. We mustn’t be lulled into the fallacious belief that having a compassionate community entails swift and successful reform.
We must start by opening the discussion and engaging all: educators and non-educators alike. We must be willing to put all of our cards on the table. We must be big enough to get past professional competition and exchange our recipes for success, and we must be prepared to admit where we’re failing.
After all, isn’t education supposed to be about sharing anyway?
Technorati Tags: money, technology, perspective, web2.0, education, peer2peer, teaching, economics, community, philosophy, blogging, learning
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds


















BlogoSquare
5 Comments so far (Add 1 more)